UNMIK-KFOR-UNMIK Police-UNHCR Briefing, 28 May 2001

UNMIK Spokeswoman Susan Manuel
KFOR Spokesman Sqdrn. Ldr. Roy Brown
UNMIK Police Spokesman Derek Chappell
UNHCR Spokeswoman Astrid van Genderen Stort

Susan Manuel
UNMIK Spokeswoman

Border Crossing Regulation

In an effort to thwart the movement of extremists into and out of Kosovo, UNMIK has recently promulgated a regulation, which limits the legal boundary and border crossing points to 19 designated sites, and makes all other crossings subject to criminal prosecution.

You can get a copy outside of the UNMIK regulation 2001/10,  "On the Prohibition of Unauthorized Border/Boundary Crossings" and the administrative direction, which lists the crossing points.

We will try and spread the information more widely in the coming week.

The regulation is part of a package of legislation aimed at fighting terrorism It comes into effect on June 4, which is also the day that the weapons amnesty ends. After 4 June, possessing a weapon without authorization becomes a crime.

After 4 June, crossing borders or boundaries at places other than the 19 listed is also a crime.

The third part of this package will be a regulation on terrorism, which is now being worked on by the UNMIK legal adviser's office. A first draft will be presented to the IAC tomorrow.

As far as the border crossing regulation, those people caught crossing at any place other than the authorized crossing points will be subject to a 500 DM fine and/or 30 days in prison. The penalty is stiffer if the perpetrator was not alone, or was accompanied by juveniles while making the illegal crossing or if the person is a repeat offender, or carried a weapon, ammunition, or military clothing, supplies or equipment.

The regulation will not be applicable for refugees or internally displaced persons fleeing a territory where their lives or fundamental freedoms were threatened.

Tax collection

Last Friday, UNMIK and the representatives of the FRY along with the FRY committee for Kosovo reached agreement on the collection of taxes on the administrative boundary line between Kosovo and the FRY. The two parties agreed that no customs would be collected on goods originating or produced in Serbia.  However joint tax points will be established simultaneously and in the very near future on the ABL.  UNMIK will collect sales tax on goods entering Kosovo and will take measures to avoid double taxation of those goods. Both parties also agreed to cooperate in a joint fight against smuggling of foreign goods and tax evasion.


Sqdrn. Ldr. Roy Brown
KFOR Spokesman

Sector Bravo

The return of FRY forces to the northern and southern areas of Sector Bravo has been successfully completed, although the Joint Security forces advise us that a residual mine threat exists, particularly in the north.  FRY Special Forces have been withdrawn from the area but de-mining operations continue.

Throughout this first part of the operation, there have been no violations of the MTA or of COMKFOR's letter of Intent.  KFOR JIC teams have now been withdrawn, but will return to the GSZ before the start of the next phase of the operation.  The return to the central zone of Sector Bravo is expected to begin later this week.  We would like to provide advanced warning that the two roads running through this area; namely highway 25-2 (Mucibaba crossing) and the Dobrosin crossing, will be closed to traffic during the operation.  Detailed timings will be announced nearer the time.

Rakovina Bridges

KFOR announces that the road from Djakovica to Klina will be closed to traffic at Rakovina, from 8 June 2001, for at least seven months.  The road closure is necessary to allow the replacement of the two temporary bridges with permanent structures. 

The removal of the Rakovina road and rail bridges will begin on 15 June 2001 and is expected to last for up to 14 days, but essential preparatory works will mean that the road has be closed from 8 June 2001.  The 'de-launching', which will be carried out by KFOR engineers, has to be completed before work on the new bridges can begin.

Two new Rakovina bridges will be built by the European Agency for Reconstruction, under the contract for the UNMIK Department of Transport and Infrastructure.

The temporary Mabey & Johnson bridges, were constructed by a KFOR Dutch Engineer unit in 1999 in order to provide freedom of movement for KFOR, UNMIK and the people of Kosovo.

COMKFOR

COMKFOR, Lieutenant General Thorsten Skiaker, will address the professors and students of Pristina University at the University at 1215 today.  Media are invited to attend.


Derek Chappell
UNMIK Police Spokesman

Assault on KPS officer

An off duty KPS officer was attacked by a group of 10-15 Serbians in Mitrovica North on Saturday night.  The officer was seated in a café with a friend when the group, who knew his status as a KPS policeman and had apparently been looking for him, confronted and threatened him.  Both he and his female companion were attacked. The officer succeeded in drawing his service weapon and firing one shot before being overpowered and beaten.  The attack was broken up by the fortunate arrival on the scene of two French KFOR soldiers. The group fled. The officer received serious physical injuries but has since been treated and released. UNMIK Police and the KPS would stress that we are together attempting to create a multiethnic Kosovo Police that can serve all the people of Kosovo. The acceptance of the KPS in all communities and respect for their authority is essential to any progress for Kosovo.

Armed Affray at Pristina Economic School

At 1300 pm on May 23rd, UNMIK Police were called to a disturbance at the Economic School in Pristina. The first officer on scene was a KPS officer who reported a large fight in progress.
Two K-Albanian males were arrested, one with a hand grenade. As more police arrived, the school was sealed off and searched. Seven more K-Albanian males were arrested, with an assortment of weapons, including 2 handguns and a knife.  All 9 persons were detained and questioned, resulting in the search of 3 addresses in Pristina and the recovery of a quality of ammunition.  A description was circulated of 2 vehicles that fled the scene. One of those vehicles was located in Hajvalia by Swedish KFOR and 2 more persons arrested.  While this incident ended without injury, and shows the effective working relationship between KPS, UNMIK Police and KFOR, it is appalling to think of the potential consequences of these 11 persons choosing to resolve their dispute with weapons at a school.

Trafficking in false documents

UNMIK Police started an investigation on May 23rd when a Pristina security guard was found in possession of vehicle documents that were established to be false.  Enquiries were made that disclosed the location where they had been purchased.   On May 24rd an address in the area of Station 4, Pristina was searched. Two handguns, 150 rounds of ammunition, 400 blank Yugoslav passport applications, blank Yugoslav drivers licenses, blank Yugoslav vehicle registration documents, two Federal Republic of Yugoslavia official stamps, about 100 completed Yugoslav passport application forms, 50 passports, together with large quantity of electronic equipment, including computers, a CD-writer, scanner, printer and discs were all seized. Two K-Albanian suspects were detained. The evidence is still being examined and the investigation is continuing.  This was an investigation largely initiated and conducted by KPS officers working for the Auto Crime Unit.

Employment of KPS Officers in the Forensic Unit

In pursuance of its charter to build up a professional, credible and impartial Kosovo Police Service for eventual transfer of executive authority, UNMIK has been ever intent on

identifying and training KPS Officers across the range of technical policing skills to ensure the future sustainability of the CivPol project. As a part of this measure, the Forensic Unit in Pristina is in the process of creating a core group of KPS Officers with the requisite training in various disciplines of Forensic Science, so that they may serve as pioneers in developing this specialized unit in the Kosovo Police after the transition.

Over the last year, SEVEN KPS Officers have been selected, including three Officers redeployed to the FS Unit in April 2001, and are undergoing on-the-job training and orientation. Out of these, five officers have had previous experience in forensics and have been taken as part of our efforts to tap the already available skills and experience within the KPS and further upgrade them to be in tune with modern technological developments in the field.

The four KPS officers deployed in the FS Unit between June and September, 2000 have already satisfied their training requirements and are now independently capable of attending to crime scene processing and making crime scene reports.

Of the three recently inducted Officers, Officer Safet Vehapi has already served as Chief of the Crime Scene Investigations of the former Pristina Security Center and is now in the stage of orientation and familiarization with the Crime Scene Investigation Section. Officers Gjoke Gegaj and Bedri Vuthi have had previous experience in dactyloscopy and are assigned to train in the Fingerprint Identification Section. Both of them are expected to train further in fingerprint examination including new developments in the science of fingerprints.
This is an example of both the development of professional competency in the KPS and the recognition of past Police experience.

Weapons amnesty

We would remind everyone that this is the last week of the amnesty for the handing in of illegal weapons. All persons are urged to take advantage of this opportunity to rid themselves of weapons of war that have no place in their homes in the future of Kosovo. Daily and weekly, these weapons kill and maim innocent people. Just last week a 12 year old boy was seriously injured when a grenade that he was playing with at his home exploded. How many more unnecessary tragedies will we have to report? Many of the factors affecting peace and security here are larger political issues that individuals cannot impact, but handing in weapon is a personal statement that every individual can make and, repeated often enough, will send a powerful message about the desire for normalcy.

Crime Overview

Last week the security situation throughout Kosovo continued to remain stable. Only one murder was reported, no attempted murders. 12 grievous assaults, one kidnapping and two arsons were reported.

130 persons were arrested throughout the week, the majority in Pec, Gnjilane and Pristina.
That total includes 21 persons arrested for outstanding major crimes.


Astrid van Genderen Stort
UNHCR Spokeswoman

Sector Bravo

Although the arrival of the VJ troops in the ground safety zone into the northern and southern part of sector B of the of the Ground Safety Zone on 24 May happened without much violence, tensions increased during the evening hours as news of the killing of Veliki Trnovac Commander Llleshi spread throughout the area. Some of the IDP's entering into Kosovo stated that their move was precipitated by the death of the Commander. The total number of displaced people from Preshevo Valley in Kosovo is over 5,500. Many of the newly departed have left out of precautionary measures. Several, as reported by our office in Gnilane have expressed the wish to return as soon as possible.

On Thursday and Friday morning alone 1026 were registered as crossing into Kosovo from Preshevo Valley. Between Friday and Saturday 768 were registered. Most of the arrivals were coming from Breznica, Veliki Trnovac, Dobrosin and Koncul and had left out of precautionary reasons, not knowing what to expect of the return of the VJ troops into the area and generally unclear about the overall mood in the area.

The number of IDP's crossing into Kosovo decreased however drastically during the weekend.

UNHCR has strongly increased its field presence in the area. Together with other international actors present on the scene and in close cooperation with the local leaders, UNHCR is visiting on a regualr basis the local villages with the intention to create confidence through presence and with a view to convincing the people of the need to stay rather than leave. The fear of the local population is well understood but departure will not make the situation better.

UNHCR is alos encouraging those that left to return to their homes as soon as possible. The Muchibaba border crossing has opened again for traffic returning into Preshevo Valley and following a KFOR communique it was announced that the population is welcomed and encouraged to return back.

Arrivals from fYROM

Following the intense fightings in Lojane and Vaksince area in north Macedonia on Thursday and Friday over 2000 Albanian Macedonainas entered southern Serbia fleeing the fighting. The majorities of these people were received by the population of Miratovc and Preshevo and expressed the wish to remain there until return would be possible. Most of the people fled during the night, when fighting had stopped. During the day they had hidden in their basements. Of this group only a limited number expressed the wish to travel onto Kosovo with a view to staying with family and friends there until the situation gets better in their home villages. UNHCR will assist with the transport of these people.  Together with other organizations assistance has been provided to this new load of displaced people. The FRY government and local leaders and community have also been extremely helpful in providing assistance where needed.

UNHCR also registered over a hundred people crossing through Blace border crossing.

UNHCR is concerned about the situation in fYROM and would encourage all parties involved to show constraint and keep the human suffering and displacement as limited as possible.

Questions:

Q: Does the new border crossing regulation cover those Albanians coming from FYROM?

SM: Yes, that is what it means.  Refugees and displaced people are free to cross but they need to report to authorities and basically show that they are refugees.

Q: There have been reports of beatings and torture of refugees fleeing the FYROM.  Has the High Commissioner received these reports?

AGS:  As far as I know we didn't receive any reports.  As of Friday morning one wounded person crossed, as far as I saw, crossed into Kosovo who was wounded by a bullet.  But I haven't heard any report of beatings.

Q: How many inhabitants are there in Kosovo and do you expect the number to increase this summer?

SM:  We have never done a census of Kosovo.  As far as registration there were something like 910,000 registered inhabitants, that is, those over 16 years of age.  Those are the numbers from the registration conducted last summer. A registered inhabitant is someone who lived here on January 1st, 1998. 

Q: Is UNMIK in favor of creating ethnic states? We see this huge influx of Albanians from Serbia, Albanians from Macedonia all coming toward Kosovo.

SM: Why do you think that that would indicate that UNMIK would be in favor of such a phenomenon?  Our entire work here has been to try to create multi-ethnic institutions here.  We would not be in favor of an ethnic state.

Q: Can you clarify how Commander Shefket Musliu turned himself in? What should UCPMB rebels expect in the future if the continue to turn themselves in?

RB: Over the weekend Shefket Musliu, as he agreed he would do prior to the beginning of the operation to re-enter Sector Bravo, gave himself and I believe 20 of his men up and indeed a large cache of weapons.  Shefket Musliu was then released along with his closest aides under the agreement of COMKFOR.  The reason for that was that it was considered that he would be of more value to the process a free man.  He would be able to continue to appeal and speak directly to his followers to continue on the path of peace, to lay down their arms and either to stay at home or to come across the boundary and give themselves up to KFOR.  Those that do come across at this point will be initially detained and then each individual case will be reviewed very quickly.  Provided that we are content that those individuals have not committed a serious crime and that they do not represent a threat to a safe and secure environment in Kosovo, they will almost certainly be released.

Q: Why are you not searching and collecting weapons in the Serbian areas like Gracanica or North Mitrovica?

DC:  Wherever UNMIK Police come across illegal weapons, they are ceased and the appropriate charges are laid.  It is certainly not true that we are not enforcing the weapons legislation in the same way throughout all of Kosovo.  We attempt to provide the same policing service in all areas of Kosovo.  Obviously in some areas we have more difficulties than in others but even in the weapons amnesty program we are having weapons surrendered to us in the Serbian areas as well as the Albanian areas.  We are confiscating weapons in all areas of Kosovo.

Q: What will happen to those UCPMB rebels still in Bondsteel?  What about the 16 that have been detained under the "Hard Policy" since the amnesty expired? Do you expect them to be released?

RB:  I don't have the figures at my fingertips.  Certainly there were 16 and then a few more thereafter under the policy following the re-entry.  What I can tell you is part of the overall situation that we are looking at with the detainees, every single one that is in Bondsteel or Dubrava, their case is being reviewed by KFOR against the criteria that I mentioned, have they committed a serious crime, is there strong evidence that they have done so and do they continue to pose a threat to the safe and secure environment in Kosovo.  As a result of those investigations and reviews, each individual case will be treated accordingly.  As I say if there is no reason to continue to detain them, then it makes sense that they are released.

Q: In your last response you said the criteria is: if there is strong evidence that they have committed a serious crime, and do they continue to pose a threat to the safe and secure environment in Kosovo.  Is that an "and" or an "or" question?

RB:  I think if we look at the wording there, clearly if someone has committed a serious crime they are likely also to be considered as presenting a threat to the safe and secure environment, don't you think?

Q: But if they come back across the border handing in arms and wearing uniforms then they likely are to have committed an armed insurrection.

RB: Yes, but under the amnesty provided by the FRY forces, the actual act of being in uniform, having a weapon or being involved in armed insurrection is not being considered a serious crime.  That is what the amnesty covers.  The amnesty provided by the FRY authorities does not cover various crimes like rape, murder, kidnapping and so forth.

Q: If anyone from the NLA surrenders, what will be the policy for him?  The same as the UCPMB after the amnesty deadline?

RB: They are currently still being detained under the original policy.  Anyone considered extremists will be detained and again the case will be looked at individually.  It depends on the individual case and the evidence we have against them.

Q:  But will the evidence provided by the FRY government be taken into consideration?

RB: No, we have always maintained a very clear policy on that.  Individuals are detained based on the evidence available to KFOR, provided by KFOR sources.

Q: About the report on the Krivenic shelling, is KFOR staying with its policy not to reveal what happened that day?
RB:  We have never had a policy of not revealing what happened that day, as you know.  The report is currently in the FYROM. It is with the Joint Implementation Committee there.  It was set up by Lord Robertson.  Our report is there.  The FYROM report is there.  They are currently being reviewed by the Joint Implementation Committee and we expect it to be released in time.  I think you have to accept though that the FYROM government is somewhat busy with other aspects of government and they will get around to dealing with that report as soon as they can.

Q: We understand that those UCPMB suspected of serious crimes will be handed over to UNMIK Police.  What will happen to them?

SM: As of last week they had not decided, but we don't have anyone to act it on.  I asked to legal office about it and they had not decided what to do.  It was being worked on.

Q: How many are there who committed serious crimes?  We hear there are 2 in Bondsteel.

RB:  I am not entirely sure what happened to them.  I think when they reviewed the cases the evidence was not strong enough to detain them.

Q: Belgrade recognizes that they killed Commander Lleshi.  Did they give KFOR any explanation as to why they killed him?

RB: Commander Lleshi was killed in an engagement on the northern boundary.  My understanding after having looked at all the reporting that has come in from various direction and was initially very confusing, what appears to have happened is this: some of his men got into a firefight with the VJ soldiers on the boundary of the northern sector.  Commander Lleshi went there.  We believe from what he told Shawn Sullivan is that he went there with two purposes in mind.  One was to get some children who were in danger out of danger and the other was to encourage his troops to disengage from that firefight as part of a continuing effort to move toward peace.  As he moved into the area he was caught in the crossfire and was killed.

Q: Can you give us some brief details of what is in the Krivenic report?

RB: Our situation has not changed there.  The results of the Krivenic report will be released by the Joint Implementation Commission that sits in the FYROM that was set up by Lord Robertson.  They will do that as soon as they get around to actually completing their review of the report.

Q: Are you preparing an amnesty program for the NLA?

RB: Not directly no.  We are not organizing any kind of amnesty or reduction of our efforts against them.  But be assured that KFOR is engaged there.  We continue to operate around the border.  We are working through the NCCCC in Skopje to the FYROM MOD and that is very much one of our follow up prime focuses to see what we can do in northern FYROM.

Q: If you grant amnesty to them, are you considering them to be from Kosovo?

RB:  I am not going to speculate on anything that we have not decided yet.  But if we take the 450, now rapidly approaching 500, UCPMB fighters that came across and gave themselves up to KFOR, of the first 450, 70% actually live in the Preshevo Valley.  So they are not from Kosovo.  They live in the Preshevo Valley and we would hope that on completion of the operation they will return to the Preshevo Valley and pick up with their lives.

Q: How many detainees are in Bondsteel and what are their nationalities?

RB: I don't actually have those figures but I can make a phone call after this and try and get them for you.

Q: Since the Krivenic shelling was in Kosovo, why hasn't KFOR released its report to the media?  It sounds like a cover-up.

RB: Nothing has changed.  There is no cover-up.  We said right from the very start that there would be two independent reports into the incident.  One conducted by KFOR and the other conducted by the FYROM authorities.  Both of those reports have now been completed.  Both reports are now with the Joint Implementation Commission in Skopje.  They will compare the two, try and draw real conclusions from those to reports and then they will release the conclusions and the contents of the reports. 

Q: If you say that 30% of the 450 are from Preshevo Valley.  Then what do you say to those who say that violence is being exported from Kosovo and that KFOR is doing nothing about it?

RB: It is quite the contrary.  I think you misheard.  70% of those that were screened and released between the 16th and 24th of this month, 70% of those came from the Preshevo Valley.  The other 30% came from various countries including the FYROM, Albania, Kosovo and others.  So I think those statistics would suggest that we have been pretty successful in preventing the export of violence from Kosovo into the Preshevo Valley.  We think we have been equally successful in preventing export of violence into northern FYROM.

Q: Why are there 2 reports - one from KFOR and one from the FYROM - if the deaths in Krivenic happened in Kosovo?  How can you consider the FYROM report to be independent when they are suspected of the shelling?

RB: There were always going to be two reports.  Neither side has all the facts, therefore the two reports are to be drawn up in parallel and the idea of that is so that they will be open and clear.  If we had done a joint investigation I am sure you would have picked up on that as the wrong way to do the report.

Q: Will the 2 reports be published separately?

RB:  The final findings will be joint but the two reports will continue to stand as separate reports.

Q: Does this mean that the two reports don't match on where it was fired from?

RB: I don't think you can draw that conclusion at all and that is certainly not where I am coming from.  I haven't actually seen the report produced by the FYROM authorities, but obviously it will have detail that not available to use and we will have detail that was not available to them.  This is why two reports have been produced.

Q: If you already have 2 reports, why not accept a 3rd one from the NLA?

RB: An interesting question.  There are two reports, one from our side as I said which deals with all the facts as we know them and the FYROM authorities have produces one with their thoughts. There is no reason to believe that their report will necessarily blame the NLA and the NLA is not a recognized authority and therefore we would not take a report from them.