|
|||
|
17 October 2002 Thursday Edition CONTENTS
Serbs must participate in the
elections, says Radosavljevic (Koha Ditore) "It is difficult to believe in promises or even guarantees based on the experience of Kosovo Serbs; nonetheless, they must participate in the elections because they will win something, and they will lose a lot if they don't," he said. Radosavljevic reportedly accused some elements in Serbia, without specifying any names, of manipulating Kosovo Serbs for the sake of political interest and ambition. "The fact that there are a lot of problems surrounding the Serb community in Kosovo on security, freedom of movement and returns doesn't give the right to individual political representatives to get their people into bigger problems," he said. "I don't think the time has come to cease relations with the international community. It is never late to take such steps, but such a thing is a very difficult decision," he concluded Maliqi: Covic's time is running
out (Java) Kosovo chief administrator Michael Steiner is having intensive talks with Serb leaders. On Tuesday, he had a meeting in northern Kosovo with local leaders and on Wednesday he met with Serb government officials in Belgrade. Steiner is trying to convince the Serbs that his seven-point plan for Mitrovica is a promising starting point for everyone, UNMIK, Albanians and Serbs. With such an approach and with the full support of internationals, Steiner's plan leaves little or no room to maneuver for Serbs who dislike the plan. The Serb government showed its objection to Steiner's plan by publishing two documents prepared by Nebojsa Covic, head of the Serb Coordination Council for Kosovo. Belgrade insists on the signing of a preliminary agreement between the Serb government and UNMIK, which would guarantee security and the most advanced form of self-government for Serbs. Even the plan of the chief administrator focuses on the issue of self-government, as an issue that would be solved through negotiations after Serb participation in 26 October local elections. However, Belgrade wants to switch things around: first, guarantees of self-government, and then participation in Kosovo elections. A year ago, Serbs conditioned their participation in the elections on an agreement with UNMIK and they achieved their goals. By blackmail, Belgrade managed to assure the symbolic reconfirmation of its sovereignty over Kosovo and its patronage over Kosovo Serbs. However, UNMIK and the internationals are no longer willing to support Belgrade's aspirations to legalize parallel authorities in Kosovo. Recommendations from the United Nations and world powers have authorized Steiner to solve the problem of northern Kosovo and Serb enclaves that are still linked to Belgrade and not with UNMIK and Kosovo institutions. De-legalization and the dissolution of parallel institutions is the line that defines the character of Steiner's plan, beyond which he cannot yield and make further concessions to Serbs. Belgrade knows this and so made public the project for changing the Constitutional Framework. Serbs want guarantees for self-government through a new agreement between UNMIK and Belgrade, which implies the right to create a union of Serb enclaves; and this means the recognition of a greater territorial autonomy for Serbs with consequence being Kosovo's federalization. However, despite the broad competencies he has, Steiner knows that he cannot negotiate this Serb proposal without consulting and securing the support of Kosovo institutions. If Steiner agreed to blackmail from Covic and Kosovo Serb leaders, this would consequently exclude Albanians from the decision-making process in Kosovo. This means that UNMIK would take a bigger bite than it can swallow and it would also have destabilizing consequences for Kosovo. Covic's project offers the legalization of Kosovo's ethnic division, and on the other hand, Steiner's plan offers a model of a Serb self-governance within integrating democratic processes. Belgrade and Serb leaders don't have much more time to blackmail UNMIK. Kosovo deputies to approve laws,
not give opinions (Koha Ditore) Can you tell us what your work in Kosovo entailed? What have you asked of assembly members during the training, and what
did they tell you about the establishment of Kosovo institutions? What do you mean? How do assembly members react to your training? After you return to Germany, what will be the message of your report;
what will your future suggestions be for the assembly and institutions
in Kosovo? How helpful has this training been for the assembly members? When do you expect the Kosovo Assembly to be as efficient as the German
Parliament? Prishtina Radio Television (Java) That "RTK is anything but a public service" points to the urgent need for Kosovo to be rehabilitated and confront the injustices done to Prishtina Radio Television and its employees. Kelmendi says he doesn't know how these injustices can be redressed, but "what I know is that the RTK project, as it is right now, is not even able to deal with a simple telephone call from a leader who wants to have two minutes on the news, much less with criticisms and arguments". Kelmendi says that the same thing happened in Bosnia. He thinks the reason for this is that public services should emanate from a developed democracy. In these "democracies in training", as ours is, says Kelmendi, we cannot speak about independent institutions, even if Agim Zatriqi [present RTK director] writes it hundreds of times. RTK as a public service project has failed, just as it has failed as everywhere in Balkans, says Kelmendi, who would like to take off the mask that RTK is wearing and give it the name of state television it always had. In this way, at least one injustice could be undone. Adnan Merovci: A victim of freedom
of speech (Java Weekly) Merovci says that at first the new KTA manager, Roger Reynolds, and PTK director general Leme Xhemë did not get on well. Merovci says he repeatedly warned Xhemë that some day she was going to be manipulated and misused by Reynolds. Now he is certain who cooperated with whom and who was really behind his suspension. He told Java that before going public with his remarks and his statement about irregularities at PTK, he had reviewed all the issues from the day he started work at PTK on 1 January 2002; and he had no regrets. "I should be so lucky to be a victim of freedom of speech against irregularities at PTK," he said. Merovci said recently that he possesses additional evidence about issues he has discussed with the media, whether or nor he reveals what he knows. "My fight against the irregularities at PTK is going to be permanent. From this day on, I will seek justice through legal means," he said. How did he feel when he was obliged to leave his PTK office with a bag and an apple? "My bag symbolizes my fight as a citizen against the irregularities at PTK, and the "unbitten" apple symbolizes that I have only eaten legitimate apples and not "forbidden" apples during my time at PTK," says Merovci. Who bought the teachers of Kosovo
for 44 euros? (Java Weekly) During the strike, education workers remained devoted to the Joint Union of Education, Science and Culture (SBASHK) and didn't give in until the last moment. In the end, the education workers were the losers. No strike will give them higher salaries, even if they decide to go out again after four months. In the end, it appears that the SBASHK organizer wasn't committed, after he signed an agreement with the government of Kosovo without fulfilling the demands of the education workers. Somebody bought 22,000 education workers in Kosovo for a price of 44
euros! The Albanian national flag and Skenderbe [represent] traditional Albanian values, while [displaying] the American flag is an expression of respect for the US' determinant role in Kosovo's liberation. We don't believe that there is a Kosovo citizen who doesn't respect these values. The second reason is that these values are considered a source of political legitimacy. A traditional patriotism combined with friendship with USA, pro-western discourse, with the aim to join NATO and EU, is certainly acceptable to every Kosovar voter. However, it is becoming more and more obvious that respect for these symbols and the realization of these aims requires more work and organization and much less apathy. Kosovo Campaign Coverage Dailies report that KPC members voted yesterday, and so did the inhabitants of Pllanjik, Orqusha and Glipotok in Sharr. The KPC voted because they are on duty on 26 October, and the others because the whether forecast foresees bad whether in the region on election day. Dailies also report on OSCE Head of Mission Paschal Fieschi's visit to
Gorazhdec village in Peja/Pec region. In an article entitled Fieschi prays
Gorazhdec Serbs to participate on election, Zëri quotes a Serb dweller
as saying, "This event [attack on Serb pensioners in Peja/Pec] was
a clear message that we cannot participate in elections." "It
is your absolute right, but how can your voice be heard, if you don't
elect your representatives," Fieschi replied. In Podujevë/Podujevo, President Rugova said that "good local
government hastens formal recognition of Kosovo's independence".
Koha Ditore also reports that Gani Prekopuca, president of LDK in Fushë
Kosovë/Kosovo Polje, promised to establish electric train service
from his municipality to Prishtina/Pristina. Zëri quotes Rugova as
saying in Kastriot/Obilic, "Natural resources in Kastriot should
be exploited." Serbs getting close to vote only in the predominantly Serb municipalities,
says Oliver Ivanovic (Radio TV B92) "It is very unlikely that Serbs would participate in the elections under such conditions. Thus, we are much closer to a solution that they participate in the elections only in the predominantly Serb municipalities where we ourselves can have a majority and ensure protection of our rights. At this moment, we are very pleased with Belgrade's position regarding the issue. I would say that the Republican and Federal authorities expressed a lot of understanding. They listened to us and heard what we pointed out as a problem and how we saw it. I would say that they would stand behind us regardless which decision we eventually make," said Ivanovic. Ivanovic assessed SRSG Michael Steiner's decentralization plan as not containing anything "concrete", but only "a list of nice wishes". "There are no security instruments in this plan that could guarantee any protection for us," he stressed. During his visit to Belgrade, Steiner said that the process of decentralization would be stopped unless Serbs decided to participate in the elections. "Steiner could have already implemented this and Serbs would participate in such elections. How do they plan to guarantee Serbs an equal participation in democratically elected and constituted institutions, when they cannot even guarantee freedom of movement to them in the municipalities where they are not a majority?" he asked. Steiner did not receive support from the Serbian
Orthodox Church (BETA) The eparchy assessed that the UNMIK chief is wrong when he identifies his plan with the Serb plan for decentralizing the province, elaborating that the proposal of the CCK envisages the reconstruction of the municipal authorities on "the entire territory of the province so that it would enable Serbs to more directly and freely take part in resolving their problems and preserving their ethnic, spiritual and cultural characteristics." Decision on participation tomorrow or Saturday,
four options still under review, says Marko Jaksic (Fonet) Father Sava says that the Serbian Orthodox Church
cannot support those who have been deceiving Serbs for three and half
years (SRNA) |