|
SRSG Press Conference, 19 March 2002
SRSG Michael Steiner
UNMIK Spokeswoman Susan Manuel
Welcome everybody; here is Mr. Steiner. Off with your cell phones, please.
SRSG Michael Steiner
Good to see you again. What are you interested in?
I am just coming from the meeting with representatives of the Serb community
in the Assembly. If I want to sum it up, it is fair to say this was a
very intensive and fruitful talk.
We have essentially addressed three issues; one is the participation
of the Serbs in the government in accordance with their constitutional
right; second, we discussed return, which is obviously one of the essential
issues for them; and thirdly we have discussed the security situation
in Kosovo.
We agreed that they will work very closely with the Head of the office
of Return and Communities in my office, Andrew Whitley. I intend also
to continue this dialogue between UNMIK and the elected members of the
Assembly on a more regular basis. This would be taken up by Chuck Brayshaw,
my Principal Deputy and by others, so that we have this continuous dialogue.
Concerning the participation in the Provisional Government, I have explained
the possibilities, and what the offer is--that is the Ministry for Agriculture,
Forestry and Rural Development. As well,--as they are interested specifically
in the issue of return,-- that we would create the function of an assistant
minister responsible for cooperation in returns issues, and on issues
of communities, within the Prime Minsters office. I have talked
with the Prime Minister, Prime Minster Rexhepi, on this issue.
This offer both addresses the substantial needs of the Serbs, but on
the other hand also respects the Constitutional Framework. The Constitutional
Framework explains clearly that return is an issue within the reserved
powers of UNMIK, within my reserved powers, so that is why there is no
minister for return, and there cannot be a minister of return, because
I am not in a position to derogate from the obligations I have under 1244,
or the Constitutional Framework.
But on substance, I think this is a very good offer, because the one
who coordinates these issues within the government can address exactly
the points the Serb representatives, for good reasons, want to see addressed.
Part of the offer which is now on the table for the Serb representatives
is also,-- and one should not forget that--, that they have to nominate
very quickly representatives to lower levels in the different ministries.
And there are number of posts for experts. I have explained how many there
are in the different ministries and in the Prime Ministers office,
so one should not underestimate this need to participate and to nominate
qualified people.
Finally, we have also agreed to work more closely together in the future
on return issues. You have to see that the Serb representatives in the
Assembly have also, of course, the obligation in the interest of Serbs
here to make their living conditions easier and to make return possible.
So, what is on offer is a comprehensive package addressing both the question
of posts in the government as well as substance. They of course now have
to meet in their caucus; they have to make up their mind, as they have
just now listened to the offer made to them, and I hope very much that
they will come back with a positive answer once they have discussed the
issue within their caucus.
Let me also address the other issue with which I was concerned yesterday
in Skopje, and you might be interested in this. Just to outline the broad
understanding we have reached--.
President Trajkovski and I agree that it is now time that both in Macedonia,
as well as in Kosovo, that both can develop their potential first and
foremost in the economic field. If you want to do that; and we both want
to do that--I want to do that here in Kosovo, he wants to do this in Macedonia--,
what is the precondition you need?
If you want to foster the economy and if you want to have a more prosperous
society on both sides of the border, you need to have stability and you
need to take advantage of the fact that this is a neighbouring country
and that, of course, both sides can profit from mutual exchange.
On the issue which has been disputed: as you know, I have always said
I am working for the UN; I am working for the Security Council. You know
that the Security Council has taken a position on the border issue last
March, before I came here. The question is not whether we like it or not;
the question is not whether I like it or not. I have to accept what the
highest organ of the international community has as a position, so I cannot
in any way negotiate on this issue: there, my hands are tied.
But what I can address and what I did address in Skopje are the practical
needs of the people who are living in this border area. There are farmers
who have an interest in going to the other side, to go to their fields.
Now that spring is coming, it is high time that they can do that in such
a way that they are unhindered and can continue their life on the ground.
In order to make this possible, I have proposed to President Trajkovski
that we form a Joint Expert Committee, which should address these very
practical questions which are the most pressing issues for the people
on the ground.
After disusing this issue with his government, he has agreed to this
proposal. We have also said that this committee should meet as soon as
possible. From my side I intend to nominate as the Co-chair from UNMIK
Jean Cady, who is my Deputy, and we discussed this morning what should
be the mandate and how we would like this to proceed.
I also intend, of course, to go for advice here from the government as
well as from local representatives so that we can take up the concerns
of the people affected in the border region.
A second proposal I made to President Trajkovski was also accepted, and
that was that,-- yet again Mr. Cady, because he is the responsible Pillar
Head,-- will go, hopefully next week, to Skopje, and take up with the
Macedonians issues which are of mutual interest; and mainly I want to
mention the area of police cooperation, a very important issue. Another
issues which is in the mandate of Jean Cady is the question of the recognition
of the license plates. This is very important for Kosovars, as well as
the the issue of travel documents and visas.
Finally, I have also agreed with President Trajkovski that we look together
into the issue of Blace, which is in the interest of both sides, but still
takes time. Perhaps we need also to address together the European Commission,
to address President Prodi, in this aspect.
So, let me say, understanding the emotions concerning the border issue
and asking you for your understanding, this is an issue I cannot address
because that is with the Security Council. But what I can do is address
the practical issue, and that this could be done in such a productive
way with President Trajkovski shows that it is right now to look also
beyond Kosovo, and to look into relations with the neighbourhood. I hope
very much that what we have agreed upon yesterday will bear fruit in the
next days in the future, specifically in the interest of people, because
that is our mandate, and what we have to work for.
Finally, if you allow me, I would address also the issues of the Agreement
reached between Serbia and Montenegro, just to make some more procedural
remarks on that.
My first point here would be to say that of course we all should welcome
this, if after a long, burning dispute which was ongoing now for months
and years between Belgrade and Podgorica, they reached a conclusion, a
common understanding with the help of Javier Solana, to diffuse tensions.
And to diffuse tensions and different views, to calm the situation, is
of course also in the interest of Kosovo.
So, one can only welcome what has been achieved there. But what concerns
Kosovo: Kosovo is ruled by 1244, as you know, and what concerns the future
status of Kosovo,-- there is a specific stipulation in 1244, and that
is paragraph 11, line e,--which tasks me to facilitate, when the time
is ripe, the solution of the final status.
So, we will come to that, and I will address this issue when the time
is there. But before we address the status questions, before we come to
that, we first have to do our homework here; and that is also what is
expected from me.
We need in the core areas of our activities, both of the Provisional
Government as well as of UNMIK, to reach a certain level so that we are
satisfied that Kosovo can rely also on its own, on functioning institutions,
on a better economy, on security for all and, last but not least, on crime
prevention.
So what we need to do, probably, in the following days and weeks, is
to reach some benchmarks where we would feel ourselves, not ideally, but
more or less satisfied, with the progress made.
Why do I say that: I think that before we can address, and come to the
question of the future status, we want Kosovo to be a honourable and respected
society. We do not want to be an aircraft for organized crime. We want
Kosovo to be a society where people feel safe, where people can say we
have institutions which work, institutions we can rely upon. We have an
economy which is may be difficult, but is on a good way; and where we
have security for all communities living there.
Once we have that, and I think we should all work together to get there
as quickly as possible, then we need to, and we will take up, the issue
of the final status. We will also have to have a dialogue on this issue
with Belgrade, no doubt. This does not mean that Belgrade would get a
veto. Nobody would get a veto; but of course, one needs to talk, as everybody
else does here in the region.
So let me just say that we come to the status question: we are not there
yet. First we have to do our homework. The sooner we this homework, the
earlier we come to the status question, but this will be done on the merits
of 1244, and will be done as it is prescribed in 1244, and so to speak
in a way which is in line with what the international community has requested
from us.
Thank you very much.
SM: Thank you Mr. Steiner.
Questions to follow.
|