|
Media Analysis 13 October 2003
- Vienna without the Prime Minister, the President
represents Kosovo (Koha)
- Vienna is a photo opportunity for Kosovars, not for
internationals (Koha)
- Dialogue to begin even without approval of Kosovo's
assembly (Epoka E Re)
- Surroi : The seriousness of the circus (Koha Ditore)
- Palokaj: Bajram Rexhepi wants too much - Kosovans
cannot reach consensus
- Shala: Continuity as politics (Zëri)
- Demaçi: The political day is dawning (Epoka
e Re)
- The OSCE has changed the course of action, it gives
priority to 'multi' projects (Epoka e Re)
- Citizens: Serbia should apologize first (Epoka e
Re)
Vienna without the Prime Minister, the President
represents Kosovo (Koha)
Koha Ditore reported that the epilogue of the political marathon on the
talks between Kosovo and Serbia is that the talks are going to start on
October 14th in Vienna, and that the Kosovan delegation will include SRSG
Harri Holkeri, President Ibrahim Rugova, Assembly Speaker Nexhat Daci
and the Coordinator for Returns Milorad Todorovic. The Kosovan Health
Minister was also invited to attend the first meeting, but her participation
is uncertain due to private reasons.
On the other hand, Prime Minister Bajram Rexhepi sent a public message
to the citizens of Kosovo on Sunday saying that he was not going to Vienna
to meet with the Belgrade representatives, 'because this is neither the
right time nor manner'.
'We express our deep regret that the Prime Minister has decided not to
go to Vienna. As you know our governments are strongly committed that
dialogue should start now. This was the unique stance of Quint since the
beginning. This is the reason why we all will be represented in Vienna,'
said the press release issued by the US Liaison Office in Prishtina on
behalf of the Quint.
The paper further reported that the Prime Minister made it clear through
a TV address that he will not go to Vienna. 'I will not go to the meeting
that is organized by UNMIK in Vienna,' Rexhepi was quoted as saying.
'The whole international community has worked tirelessly to support President
Ibrahim Rugova and other Kosovo leaders who wish to give the people of
Kosovo the chance to be represented on a broad basis at the opening of
direct talks between Pristina and Belgrade in Vienna on Tuesday,' said
a statement issued by SRSG Holkeri after Rexhepi's decision.
'After intensive consultations, Kosovo President Ibrahim Rugova and the
Assembly Speaker Nexhat Daci decided to participate in the Vienna talks,'
said the press release issued by the Kosovo President's office.
Vienna is a photo opportunity for Kosovars, not
for internationals (Koha)
Koha Ditore conducted an interview with the head of Italian Liaison Office
in Prishtina Pasqual Salzano regarding upcoming dialogue in Vienna and
the privatization process.
What will happen if Kosovo's delegation goes to Vienna and what will
happen if it doesn't go?
Vienna talks are a great opportunity that is offered to Kosovars. It is
important that talks are not only held but are also constructive. It is
true that the Kosovo delegation has unclarity, but it is also clear that
they will participate in the talks and what is important is that Kosovars
participation is confirmed. There are some radical elements that have
put unacceptable conditions for the moment. However, this would not harm
beginning of the talks in Vienna. I have to repeat that participation
of the Kosovar delegation is an advantage for Kosovars and not for the
international community and it is not a favor that is done to the international
community. This is in the interest of Kosovo.
Few days ago we have seen a statement from Brussels, where EU announced
consequences for Kosovo if Kosovars do not go to Vienna. Could you explain
to us what consequences are being talked about?
Consequences of non-participation in dialogue are already overcome. Non-participation
does mean that Kosovars do not understand the importance of this dialogue
and also conveys to the international community a message of political
immaturity. If the international community assesses that Kosovo is politically
immature, this would be damaging for Kosovo and will have great consequences.
This is an opportunity for the Kosovar politicians to prove their maturity
before the international community and it is very important for Kosovo.
It is clear that the way towards Europe is based on political maturity.
Along with political maturity, what is the practical requirement of EU
for talks in region?
Some voices have said that this dialogue serves as a photo opportunity
for the international community. This is not true. The reality is that
this is an opportunity for Kosovars. It does not mean that dialogue on
practical issues will provide the solution for all problems in Kosovo.
But what is of great importance is the opinion that is generated in capitals
that have impact in the Balkans. It is necessary to send a positive signal.
This is the most significant need for Kosovo and the Kosovar politicians.
Kosovo shouldn't send only negative signals. Now is the opportunity to
send a positive signal that would be heard across the world.
Is a Kosovo delegation that includes only the President and the Assembly
Speaker but not the Prime Minister valid for the EU?
Holkeri has already sent invitations and you know that Quint had constructive
talks with the local politicians and we also believe that participation
would be from the highest level. If there are radical elements that do
not support this important dialogue that is regrettable. However one thing
should be clear, by acting in this way you will harm Kosovo. Recently
prominent personalities such as the former US President Clinton, former
Ambassador Holbrooke and former reputable SRSG Kouchner had visited Kosovo.
These personalities had a fundamental role in Kosovo. They had the opportunity
to talk openly. These personalities that you consider friends, expressed
themselves openly and gave clear messages. They said that Vienna talks
might create advantages for Kosovo. This is a message that we are transmitting
to Kosovo. I believe that this is the biggest guarantee for participation
in the dialogue. The worst thing for a friend is when you betray the confidence.
It would be very hard and meaningless if Kosovo's people betray these
persons that it considers as its friends.
According to your information from the meetings that you had recently,
what are the reasons that PDK and AAK aren't participating in the dialogue?
This is a question that you should address to them. From my point of view
it is incomprehensible that Kosovar leaders who have Kosovo's welfare
in their hearts do not understand or appear not to understand how important
and significant is this opportunity that the international community is
offering to Kosovo.
Some of the comments that arose from politicians and analysts in the
media are that dialogue is not prepared very well and it might prejudge
Kosovo's status? Is there a place for these statements?
They are absolutely false. Talks in Vienna are focused on technical issues
of mutual interests. There is absolutely no connection with the final
status. The international community will determine the final status of
Kosovo at an appropriate time. Actually Resolution 1244 is the only effective
document on Kosovo. Guarantees that Vienna talks will not impact on the
final status are given by the EU, our American friends, the Contact Group
and NATO, so I do not know what else you need.
What will happen after October 14?
On October 14 the dialogue will begin, then there will be a need to form
technical working groups. It would be a low profile technical task that
would deal with eventual agreements on communication, energy and missing
persons. However, it is important to give an important message to the
world on October 14.
We had news that on Friday in Gjakova Airport had landed the first civil
aeroplane Boeing 737. How does Italy see the future of this airport?
Gjakova Airport makes Italian aeronautics proud. It is an airport that
is built completely by the Italian military aeronautics. Currently we
are trying to extend the flying field and we are in close contact with
the Ministry of Communication and Transport as well as with UNMIK in order
to solve problems of property ownership around the airport. So, Gjakova
airport will be functional for both military and civilian flights. This
will be a very important factor for Kosovo's economic development because
during the winter Prishtina airport is very often closed as a result of
fog. When the right time comes, Italy is ready to gift Kosovo one of the
most significant premises of the infrastructure. Not without reason is
the name of the airport 'Amico' which in Albanian means friend. This is
evidence of friendship between Kosovo and Italy. The time planned for
transforming it into a civil airport is very short. It is clear that the
airport is under the Italian KFOR command. It is understandable that that
will happen at the time when military presence will be reduced but it
is tough to start even now with a combination of military and civil airplanes
landing. It is important that we build the airport with the aim to give
Kosovo a proper infrastructure.
The privatization process is stopped after concerns for immunity from
responsible authorities. Did you speak to the new KTA managing director
Maria Fucci and what is your opinion about this problem?
I am aware that the KTA head now is a competent woman, Maria Fucci. I
would like to stress that government does not appoint her. Mrs. Fucci
is appointed in that post because of her great experience in the Balkans
and in Europe. Privatization process, for us, is a significant element
of economic development. We are aware of the legal problems that came
up and also of the charges that have been made at international courts.
We repeat again our belief that we have in Mr. Lambsdorf and we also understand
that there are some problems that should be solved. We will work concretely
to solve these problems for the benefit of everybody.
Dialogue to begin even without approval of Kosovo's assembly (Epoka E
Re)
Epoka e Re carried a report from Radio Free Europe where an anonymous
senior US State Department official supports upcoming dialogue between
Prishtina and Belgrade.
A senior US State Department official said that talks between Prishtina
and Belgrade would begin on October 14, even though Kosovo Assembly did
not approve it. Questioned by Radio Free Europe whether talks will be
postponed because Kosovo Assembly hasn't approved the dialogue, a senior
unnamed US official said that 'disapproval by the Kosovo Assembly does
not negate the possibility of participation of Kosovo's government members
in Vienna talks'.
'Talks will begin at the fixed date, October 14,' the source was quoted
as saying. 'It is in the interest of Kosovo to participate in the upcoming
dialogue. We appeal to Prishtina and Belgrade to show full and effective
participation in the upcoming dialogue,' the US State Department official
concluded.
Surroi : The seriousness of the circus (Koha Ditore)
'I think that Dr Rugova's personal decision to go to Vienna was right.
The preparations for negotiations between Pristina and Belgrade were so
unserious that it suits a person like him to attend them' writes publisher
Veton Surroi in a commentary for Koha Ditore.
1. The participants of the latest meeting of the chief administrator
Holkeri, representatives of the Quint in Kosovo and the other political
Quint in Kosovo (the President, the PM, the Assembly Speaker, and heads
of two Albanian governmental parties) did not leave an impression other
than a comical scene that was performed five consecutive times during
this meeting. Kosovo's administrator, Holkeri, had decided that it was
the day for a decision on starting negotiations in Vienna and that all
Albanians were to declare their position on this. From the beginning,
he banged the table and asked who was 'pro' and before he finished his
sentence, Dr. Rugova, as the President of a part in Kosovo and as head
of LDK, said he was 'pro'.
This scene, full of contradictions, was repeated five times.
The fact that Rugova declared 'pro' almost every hour to go to Vienna
this Tuesday did not surprise me much. In the past years I have seen and
heard Dr Rugova do these gestures without consulting anybody, without
being adequately briefed on what it was about, and not bothering about
the consequences such a gesture may have for Kosovo.
At the end of the day his calculations have been simpler than the complicated
analysis made out in the media over the last few days. Dr Rugova would
calculate his personal position in that respect. When Ambassador Holbrooke
convinced him to go and meet Milosevic for the first time, he promised
Rugova that in two weeks time he was going to meet with Clinton. Rugova
pondered and decided that it was important for him to have a personal
meeting with Clinton. When Shainovic, the Serbian deputy prime minister
told him during the bombing that he was to meet Milosevic again, he decided
that it was for his own personal and physical good to do it. Even now,
when the representatives of the Quint told him to go to Vienna, they used
a simple trick. They told him he was going there as the President of Kosovo,
and that this would legitimize his position in front of the Serbs. For
Dr Rugova it was not important that he was elected President based on
a party consensus in the parliament and that the same parliament could
not declare over the last two months what to do with this dialogue, and
that at least two of the partners of this coalition have serious reservations
concerning preparations for foreseen negotiations in Vienna. For him it
was important to get photographed in Vienna as the President of Kosovo.
With this we can deduce the entire political philosophy of Dr Rugova:
it is form that is important, photographs. Content has never been important
for him, or how the preparations were done, topic of discussion, positive
or negative consequences for Kosovo.
2. Dr. Rugova's personal decision to go to Vienna seems proper to me.
Preparations for negotiations between Pristina and Belgrade were so unserious
that it suits a person like him to take part.
But, the problem is deeper than the lack of seriousness so far regarding
the negotiations circus.
The main problem that arose over the second week of October stretches
in three fields. The first has to do with negotiations themselves. This
way of preparation has shown lack of seriousness, while only pressure
on Kosovans to take part has shown seriousness. The ploy to divide institutions
has also been tried (convincing the President and the Parliamentary Speaker),
and not respecting the principal position of the Prime Minister of Kosovo.
The Prime Minister, realizing he was the last to take the burden of negotiations,
asked for political consensus among governmental parties. Instead of compromise
he was offered different forms of international pressure and local obstacles.
At the end of the day the seriousness of the negotiations will be proportional
to the effort we invest in them.
Second, it has to do with relations between UNMIK and Kosovo. Instead
of a dialogue about priorities and how to push forward the building process
in Kosovo, UNMIK has continued with the ways inherited from Haekkerup,
to impose priorities by UNMIK or rather by its head. In the end, UNMIK
will realize it should listen to what Kosovans have to say.
The third has to do with Kosovans, themselves. The effort for negotiations
now has revealed the well-known situation of the lack of consensus among
Albanians for everything but independence. However, even the process of
independence is a technique, not only a form; thus we see that there is
a lack of consensus even for reaching independence. Over the last two
months, our political parties swear on institutions, but the biggest two
have marginalized them, or have tried to devalue the two basic institutions
of Kosovo: the Parliament and the Government, which was established by
the same Parliament.
3. There can be a positive result in all this writhe. The first is that
there will be a more serious investment than hitherto.
The international community, no matter what happens in Vienna, can learn
a lesson that there is a need for a more serious political investment
in Kosovo, in the relations created in Kosovo. When Kosovans say they
want more competencies, it is not that they are envious; it is because
they are needy. And, when they say they want serious mediation in the
talks, it is not because they want to get photographed with officials
higher than the chief administrator, but because they trust NATO, the
US, and the EU more than UNMIK.
Kosovans can learn another lesson, which is not to wait until the last
day to show what they want and how to achieve it. Of course, everything
can count; at least if articulated through consensus in the institutions
built with that much pain.
4. Day in day out friends of Kosovo and the others have tried to formulate
a simple sentence about the answer of Kosovans on negotiations with Belgrade.
Some have said, "Kosovans are not ready", some that "Kosovans
are afraid" some that "Kosovans do not want to meet with Serbs".
It seems to me that over the last few weeks a deeper message has evolved;
yes to negotiations, but more serious negotiations than the ones prepared
so far.
Palokaj: Bajram Rexhepi wants too much - Kosovans
cannot reach consensus
In an opinion piece for Koha Ditore, columnist Augustin Palokaj writes,
'No one in Vienna wanted to imagine the Vienna meeting without Prime Minister
Rexhepi who is undoubtedly considered not only as the most pragmatic politician
but also as the only politician of this kind in Kosovo. But maybe his
burning desire to see Albanians united has turned the Prime Minister into
a victim of the party turmoil in Kosovo'.
Maybe things will change by the time this article goes out in print,
but for the time being, the Prime Minister of Kosovo, Bajram Rexhepi,
and the leader of the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo, Ramush Haradinaj,
can count on aggravating relations with representatives of the international
community because of the hesitation, that is the full opposition to dialogue
in Vienna. While the AAK leader has remained true to the opposition of
dialogue, the Prime Minister of Kosovo seems to have fallen victim to
his own desire to see Albanians united on such an important issue and
asked for a consensus in the assembly. When he didn't receive such support
from the assembly, he said that he was remaining faithful to his position
that without the blessing of the assembly he wouldn't go to Vienna.
No one in Vienna wanted to imagine the Vienna meeting without Prime Minister
Rexhepi, who is undoubtedly considered not only as the most pragmatic
politician but also as the only politician of this kind in Kosovo. But
maybe his burning desire to see Albanians united has turned the Prime
Minister into a victim of the party turmoil in Kosovo. His absence in
Vienna is going to prove something that will be more striking than the
beginning of dialogue. It is going to prove that Kosovo has no government,
because the ministers are going to attend a meeting that won't be attended
by the prime minister, it is also going to prove that Kosovo doesn't have
an assembly, because the assembly speaker continues to follow his philosophy
'I am the assembly' and it is also going to prove that Kosovans are not
perceiving the dialogue seriously, with what the international community
is going to further delay the process of resolving Kosovo's final status.
The Prime Minister was wrong when he thought that Kosovan institutions
are serious.
Facing problems in the government, where ministers protect the policy
of their own political parties and not the government, the Prime Minister
of Kosovo, who controls no ministry, sought to find support for going
to Vienna with a wrong address, the Kosovo Assembly, which should be the
collective representation of the people of Kosovo. He even wanted support
for the dialogue to be given to him as a consensus. But in this respect,
Mr. Bajram Rexhepi had overestimated the assembly, by believing that it
is serious. It could even be politically naïve to seek consensus
in an assembly where two Albanian political parties haven't voted for
the assembly speaker and Mr. Daci had to be elected with the votes of
his political party and the Serb Coalition Povratak, who were allowed
by Covic to vote for Daci. Afterwards, the assembly speaker played lottery
with the assembly members in his effort to elect Mr. Rugova as President
of Kosovo without a preliminary agreement between the three main Kosovan
political parties and at a time when Covic allowed Serbs to vote for Rugova.
If Covic hadn't done this, Rugova would have been appointed president
earlier in the same manner that Daci was appointed speaker of the assembly,
because the votes of the LDK and Coalition Povratak would have proven
to be sufficient.
Seeking consensus on such an important issue in such an assembly, without
ensuring the support of all political parties, is political naivety by
the prime minister who was motivated by the noble wish for unity in difficult
times. But now even if the Prime Minister goes to Vienna only with the
approval of the PDK, then he is going to be there a representative of
a political party and not a representative of the government, and this
will humiliate Kosovan institutions even more.
The President attend all meetings, except for meetings with other
Albanians
It seems that the only Albanian political party that will send its representatives
to the dialogue with Serbs in Vienna, if Rexhepi doesn't agree to go there
as a representative of the PDK, will be the biggest party, the LDK. The
latter will be represented by Ibrahim Rugova and Nexhat Daci, even though
the latter is said to represent Kosovan institutions. The LDK has once
again played a wise, although hypocritical game. They always told international
representatives that they were going to attend the dialogue and that they
considered it as important, whereas they didn't talk much about the issue
of dialogue in public, except for some assembly members who weren't even
clear whether or not they supported the dialogue. This party hasn't allowed
its assembly members to be seen on TV while voting in support of talks
with Serbs.
Now officials from the presidential office are saying that Mr. Rugova
has competencies to decide to go to Vienna. Rugova was elected to his
office by the Kosovo Assembly, which means that he must answer to it,
the same way the Prime Minister was elected by this institution and then
asked for its support. But President Rugova proved that he has much more
experience than Mr. Rexhepi, and Rugova's experience has taught him that
he doesn't have to ask anyone for anything and that he can decide about
everything himself, be it for his political party or for Kosovo. His political
experience taught Mr. Rugova to attend every meeting, be it even with
Milosevic, Milutinovic and Sainovic, and be it even with representatives
from Russia and the US. We have learned from Rugova's experience that
attends all kinds of meetings without slightest hesitation except for
meetings with other Albanian leaders in Prishtina or Tirana. Prime Minister
Bajram Rexhepi lacks such an experience as President Rugova.
Dialogue can and will start even without the prime minister
The start of dialogue in Vienna is going to be symbolic. It was clearly
said that this is going to happen regardless of the composition of the
delegation of Kosovans. Therefore, dialogue is going to start even in
the absence of the Prime Minister of Kosovo, and who can be more suitable
for such historic and symbolic events than President Rugova. The international
community in Vienna doesn't plan to concretely open talks on technical
issues but simply hold speeches, have lunch together, and the President
of Kosovo has good experience in these things. LDK media will give plenty
of coverage to the pictures of the president and Daci with international
leaders, Solana, Lord Robertson and Chancellor Schuessel and might ignore
the pictures taken with leaders from Belgrade. Daci and Rugova will leave
the impression that they went to attend the meeting 'because of our American
and European allies' and to talk to Serbs.
But all diplomats who will be focused on solving real issues will be
well aware of the fact that they will find it difficult to do that without
the prime minister.
The prime minister is the only politician from the 'provisional institutions
of Kosovo' who realizes the meaning of 'technical issues' or the meaning
of the 'Process of Stabilization and Association'.
Even EU leaders know that Rexhepi understand this and wants to continue
the process in a technical way without political implications, because
delays in technical issues are more difficult to be compensated than political
delays. Even if dialogue in Vienna starts without Prime Minister Rexhepi,
the EU will think of him for the rest of the process, because the plan
is to create expert teams after the first meeting in Vienna and then continue
the dialogue on the level of experts. If they decide not to punish Prime
Minister Rexhepi so harshly then they will still think about him in the
context of continuing the institution building in Kosovo. Officials in
Brussels are already saying that they are going to do a careful evaluation
of the Kosovan debate regarding dialogue with Serbs in order to identify
what in the international community are called 'bad boys'. For the time
being they are saying that 'those who are against dialogue are alone because
the international community, including all the friends of Kosovans, have
recommended dialogue'; therefore, those who are against dialogue 'are
against the whole world'. But in the end everyone will bear responsibility
for his actions and Kosovo will suffer the consequences of lack of leadership.
We are still going to have to wait for 'unity' among Kosovan leaders,
or even search the word in dictionaries and books. United in Vienna are
going to be only two delegations, the delegation from Belgrade and the
delegation of the international community.
Shala: Continuity as politics (Zëri)
Zëri carries a front-page editorial by Blerim Shala who claims that
the 'current regime in Belgrade is fully backing the results of the previous
regime.'
The developments surrounding the privatization of socially owned enterprises
in Kosovo and the blocking of this initiative by the Serbian regime, have
again actualized the relations between the current and the previous regime
in Serbia, with the latter being linked with the name (and deed) of Slobodan
Milosevic. It is known that the current Serbian regime is claiming that
it has nothing in common with the regime that was responsible for the
four big wars. Therefore, the basic principle of the post-Milosevic regime
was that of full discontinuity with his actions.
However, this principle doesn't stand when it comes to Kosovo. There
is no discontinuity here. And this is not our belief; it is the reality.
Even though Serbian officials have sometimes claimed that in 1989 Serbia
had forcibly abrogated Kosovo's constitutional status and thus gave an
international dimension to the problem of Kosovo.
The current government in Serbia recognizes as legal the actions of Milosevic's
regime that forcibly and against the will of Kosovans changed the character
of Kosovan institutions, including socially owned enterprises. It is clearly
known with what laws and under what circumstances Serbia annexed socially
owned enterprises in Kosovo. But the fact is that the current regime fully
recognizes the results of the previous regime. The current regime in Belgrade
also thinks that the legal position from the 90's should serve as a starting
point for the process of privatization in Kosovo. Such a behavior by the
current Serbian officials, in reality makes them jointly guilty for the
actions of the previous regime and at the same time responsible for new
tensions in relations, which according to westerners should enter the
phase of mutual tolerance.
Demaçi: The political day is dawning (Epoka e
Re)
In an opinion piece for Epoka e Re, the human rights activist Adem Demaçi,
wrote that 'the major runners in the Kosovan political marathon got tired
and surrendered in the drowning storm'. These are Mr. Rugova and Mr. Thaçi.
In the political arena we have a new feeling emerging, a new dynamic political
force, more and more imposing and obvious; the political figure of Mr.
Ramush Haradinaj and his party, the Alliance for the Future of Kosovo.
In times of political crisis societies divide in two major parts: the
submissive one, which sooner or later, slowly or quickly, will drown;
and the other part that can push the processes forward toward completion.
Two from our 'marathon runners in Kosovan politics' got tired and surrendered
in the drowning storm. These are Mr. Rugova and Mr. Thaçi. They
are two out of four Kosovans that signed the Rambouillet-Paris (dis)agreement
in March 1999. The above mentioned, will conclude Rambouillet-Paris act
with Vienna. With the act of Rambouillet-Paris, Mr. Rugova, Mr. Thaçi,
Mr. Qosja and Mr. Surroi, with their signatures, declared the liberation
war as a civil war and accepted the colonizer Serbia, and its terrorist,
neo-fascist, and criminal regime as their state by recognizing its sovereignty
over Kosovo.
The second act, the one of Vienna, on 14 October, will be the act of
reconciliation with the current regime in Belgrade, which has not shown
any essential change regarding Kosovo from the regime of Milosevic. The
second act of Vienna will be the act of reconciling the killer with the
rebels, the ruler with the ruled, colonizers with colonized, oppressors
with freedom lovers. After the second act, relations between Kosovo and
Serbia will be treated by Serbia and the world not as politically complicated,
but as simple technical relations. This is the interest and the wish of
world strategists, to re-colonize Kosovo by Serbia. This is the wish of
the hegemonic regime in Serbia, to re-colonize Kosovo with the support
and facilitation of the international factors.
This would happen if there weren't for the omnipotent laws of nature
and life, which consistently break barriers and obstacles of all racketeers
and defrauders of the world, and which inevitably lead to freedom, independence,
equality and happiness.
In the current political environment in Kosovo, we have a new feeling
emerging, and a dynamic political force. Mr. Haradinaj and his party the
Alliance for the Future of Kosovo. They will soon free their party from
those few members that fear political storms, and will soon find a common
language with other small parties in Kosovo. After this the Alliance will
extend with new members coming from both 'big' parties, which after strokes
by the new reality to emerge soon, it will disentangle and fall apart.
The Alliance if it can stay on course, right after the 14 of October,
2003, will become a political pivot, around which the youth of Kosovo
and the majority of Kosovo people gather.
The OSCE has changed the course of action, it gives
priority to 'multi' projects (Epoka e Re)
Epoka e Re carries an article about the Center for democracy in Peja,
which according to the paper consists of many 'dead' associations. Since
the beginning in the post-war Peja there have been more than 100 NGOs
created. They together with the internationals drafted voluminous projects
and indulged in a lot of money. To justify that money, they organized
a seminar or an excursion and everything finished with that. These associations
have started to 'die out'
After the OSCE officials had agreed to rent the house of a Roma for their
offices, they had changed their mind. They did not move into that house,
but started to prepare half of the Shopping Mall to declare it a Center
for Democracy. Many Peja citizen, took the opportunity and did not wait
for offices to be allocated, they broke the doors, changed the locks,
and put the names of their associations on their doors. First they needed
to look as serious as possible in the eyes of foreign donors in Peja,
who came in the name of developing civic society. A part of these internationals
knowing the love of Pejans for money, they soon got adopted to the new
environment. They wrote long and impressive projects together with the
heads of associations and 'snatched' money from donors. To give the impression
that the maximum was being done, the internationals and locals together
organized seminars with ridiculous topics or an excursion to clean sewage
channels from sticks, papers, and bottles. Afterwards, they organized
lunches and dinners to celebrate successful completion of projects, and
it was in these parties, in these luxurious hotels, that the first sparks
of love often started between our girls and boys from all around the world.
These romances continued until tearful breaks, with babies thrown in containers,
or under the trees in the park. However, even this did not last forever.
The OSCE and the internationals in general have changed the course of
action. In order for them to help or finance a project, it has to have
the first word 'multi'. Many of the associations could not keep the pace
with this new competition, since there are not that many Serbs or Romas
in Peja, that would be enough for those 'associations', therefore many
of them have started to 'die out' together with many other offices in
the Center for Democracy. The loss of fraud market for a part of the associations
has left their representatives without money, even to pay the debt for
electricity. This has irritated the "Power Distribution" in
Peja, which rightfully cut off the center for democracy from the power
network. In this environment, a small number of honest associations can
hardly survive. One of them is the "Association of the Families of
Martyrs". This office has also remained in the dark. So have some
media representatives. The OSCE that has an office in the 'Center for
Democracy' does not care about this situation. They have an extremely
big generator, which they use any time they need; let the others do whatever
they please.
'OSCE wants multinational projects'. Some of the youngsters have noticed
this and have come up with some projects for reconciliation. OSCE adores
these people and sends them from Kastrat (Gorazhdec) to Brezovica, even
in Ohrid, where they had a wonderful time with their Serb, Roma and Macedonian
peers. They also wrote a booklet in three languages; "We are working
for reconciliation and eradication of hatred", they say proudly.
Citizens: Serbia should apologize first (Epoka e Re)
Epoka e Re conducted an opinion poll among citizens on whether our politicians
should participate in the dialogue between Prishtina and Belgrade and
sought the people's comments on the disagreements between them. Most of
the citizens said that Serbia should first apologize for the crimes committed
in Kosovo and only then talk about dialogue.
Coal-miner Shaip Latifi said that our politicians should participate
in the talks, but they shouldn't go there unprepared. While commenting
on disagreements between our politicians he said that 'it resembles a
children's game'.
Arban Alia senior technician of electricity said that Serbs shouldn't
put conditions for talks. 'First they should apologize for the historical
crimes that they committed against Albanians,' he said.
'Disagreements are not because of the principles, because all political
parties operate within Resolution 1244; they are UNMIK tools; UNMIK paid
them, UNMIK grew them, UNMIK fed them. Their disagreements are just personal
matters of their ego, ambition, career or position,' he was quoted as
saying.
Naim Berisha said that Serbia must first apologize for what they did
in Kosovo and only after that should our politicians begin talks.
· Main Stories 13 October
· Vienna without the Prime Minister, the President represents Kosovo
(Koha)
· Prishtina goes to dialogue with uncompleted delegation (Zëri)
· Rugova and Daci decide to participate in Vienna meeting (Zëri)
· SRSG Holkeri confirms Rugova and Daci's participation in Vienna
(Zëri)
· Government on the eve of dissolution (Epoka e Re)
· Quint: Our governments want dialogue to start now (Zëri)
· Thaçi: The position of Prime Minister Rexhepi is personal
(Zëri)
· Salzano: Vienna is a photo-op for Kosovars, not for internationals
(Koha)
· Zivkovic: Talks in Vienna - a victory of the Serbian side (Epoka
e Re)
· Surroi: The seriousness of the circus (Koha Ditore)
· Shala: Continuity as politics (Zëri)
· Palokaj: Bajram Rexhepi wants too much - Kosovars cannot reach
consensus
· Holbrooke: Serbs are facing a historic crossroads (Epoka e Re)
Kosovo Media Highlights
Vienna without the Prime Minister, the President represents Kosovo (Koha)
Koha Ditore reports that the epilogue of the political marathon on the
talks between Kosovo and Serbia is that the talks are going to start on
October 14th in Vienna, and that the Kosovar delegation will include SRSG
Harri Holkeri, President Ibrahim Rugova, Assembly Speaker Nexhat Daci
and the Coordinator for Returns Milorad Todorovic. The Kosovar Health
Minister was also invited to attend the first meeting, but her participation
is uncertain due to private reasons.
On the other hand, Prime Minister Bajram Rexhepi sent a public message
to the citizens of Kosovo on Sunday saying that he was not going to Vienna
to meet with the Belgrade representatives, 'because this is neither the
right time nor manner'.
Prishtina goes to the dialogue with uncomplete delegation (Zëri)
Zëri reports that an uncomplete Kosovar delegation is going to travel
to Vienna to mark the start of dialogue with Belgrade representatives.
The Kosovar delegation will be uncomplete, because Prime Minister Bajram
Rexhepi has definitively decided not to go to Vienna. 'Talks will happen,
but only when Kosovars decide,' Rexhepi was quoted as saying.
Rugova and Daci decide to participate in Vienna meeting (Zëri)
Zëri reports that the office of the President of Kosovo has issued
a statement saying that after intensive consultations President Ibrahim
Rugova and Assembly Speaker Nexhat Daci have decided to participate in
the meeting in Vienna on Tuesday.
SRSG Holkeri confirms Rugova and Daci's participation in Vienna (Zëri)
Zëri also reports that SRSG Harri Holkeri confirmed that President
Rugova and Assembly Speaker Daci would represent Kosovans in the first
meeting between Prishtina and Belgrade in Vienna.
'Since it was seen that it was impossible to include the representatives
of the government in the Kosovan delegation, Kosovo is going to be represented
by the President of Kosovo who is a symbol of the unity of a multiethnic
Kosovo,' Holkeri was quoted as saying.
Government on the eve of dissolution (Epoka e Re)
Epoka e Re claims that the decision of Prime Minister Bajram Rexhepi not
to go to Vienna and the on the other hand the decision made by Rugova
and Daci to attend the meeting have definitively led to the downfall of
principles of the fragile coalition government. 'Now the dissolution of
the government is a realistic possibility,' added the newspaper.
Quint: Our governments want dialogue to start now (Zëri)
Zëri reports that the representatives of Quint countries have issued
a joint statement voiced their regret over the decision made by Prime
Minister Bajram Rexhepi not to attend the Vienna meeting. The Quint representatives
have also voiced their position that dialogue should start now.
Thaçi: The position of Prime Minister Rexhepi is personal (Zëri)
Hashim Thaçi, leader of the Kosovo Democratic Party (PDK) told
Zëri that there were a number of meetings between Quint representatives
and local leaders, which focused on the Kosovan representation at the
Vienna meeting.
Commenting on PM Rexhepi's decision not to attend the Vienna meeting,
Thaçi was quoted as saying, 'Prime Minister Rexhepi's position
is quite personal'.
Salzano: Vienna is a photo-op for Kosovars, not for internationals (Koha)
In an interview for Koha Ditore, Pasquale Salzano, the head of the Italian
Office in Prishtina, said that the Vienna meeting should be held because
of the value that it brings to Kosovo and not as an honor to the international
community.
'There are certain radical elements that have set up unacceptable conditions.
However, this doesn't damage the start of talks in Vienna,' Salzano was
quoted as saying.
Zivkovic: Talks in Vienna - a victory of the Serbian side (Epoka e Re)
Epoka e Re reports that Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Zivkovic said on
Sunday that upcoming dialogue between Prishtina and Belgrade was a victory
for the Serbian side, and he also added that these talks would be a good
opportunity for the Albanian side to take over its share of responsibility
for the situation in Kosovo.
Surroi: The seriousness of the circus (Koha Ditore)
'I think that Dr. Rugova's personal decision to go to Vienna was right.
The preparations for negotiations between Prishtina and Belgrade were
so unserious that it suits a person like him to attend them,' writes publisher
Veton Surroi in a commentary for Koha Ditore. [full translation in Media
Analysis]
Shala: Continuity as politics (Zëri)
Zëri carries a front-page editorial by Blerim Shala who claims that
the 'current regime in Belgrade is fully backing the results of the previous
regime. The current regime in Belgrade also thinks that the legal position
from the 90's should serve as a starting point for the process of privatization
in Kosovo. Such a behavior by the current Serbian officials, in reality
makes them co-guilty for the actions of the previous regime and at the
same time responsible for new tensions in relations, which according to
westerns should enter the phase of mutual tolerance'. [full translation
in Media Analysis]
Palokaj: Bajram Rexhepi wants too much - Kosovars cannot reach consensus
In an opinion piece for Koha Ditore, columnist Augustin Palokaj writes,
'No one in Vienna wanted to imagine the Vienna meeting without Prime Minister
Rexhepi who is undoubtedly considered not only as the most pragmatic politician
but also as the only politician of this kind in Kosovo. But maybe his
burning desire to see Albanians united has turned the Prime Minister into
a victim of the party turmoil in Kosovo'. [full translation in Media Analysis]
Holbrooke: Serbs are facing a historic crossroads (Epoka e Re)
Epoka e Re quotes the former US Ambassador to the United Nations, Richard
Holbrooke, as saying that Kosovar Albanians must guarantee the rights
of minorities in Kosovo if they want to fulfill their aspirations for
independence.
'Serbs are facing a historic crossroads. They have to choose between
Kosovo and Europe. Because if they choose Kosovo, they are going to lose
both. They know well that Milosevic has lost Kosovo,' Holbrooke added.
Kosovo Press Headlines
Koha Ditore
Front page
· Vienna to take place without prime minister, Kosovo is represented
by president
· Vienna is opportunity to take photo of Kosovans and not internationals
· Surroi: Serious circus
· New dangers for the legalization of Tetovo University [Macedonia]
· 'Monsters' with two wheels have radar
Other headlines
· We will discuss mutual issues (2)
· Election go without problems (4)
· Anger extends strike for three months (5)
· 'Vision Computers' will demand its right through the court (5)
· Interview with Svetlana Gjorgjevic (6)
· New goods from Prishtina car market (7)
· Teacher is arrested for pedophilia (8)
· Gjakova: Talks should be prepared well and with participation
of experts (8)
· German paper Bild assists Kosovan children (9)
· Mitrovica municipality analyzes method to put conditions (9)
· Palokaj: Rexhepi demands too much, Kosovans cannot reach consensus
(10)
Zëri
Front page
· Prishtina begins dialogue with Belgrade with incomplete delegation
· Quint: Our governments are strongly for beginning the dialogue
· Shala: Continuity as a policy
· Dialogue between Prishtina and Belgrade will be announced by
Schuessel
· Albright: The Contact Group was not the adequate institution
against Milosevic
· Why do banks and pension trust keep hundreds of millions out
of Kosovo?
Other headlines
· Message from New York: If you want profits, invest in Kosovo
(2)
· Vienna will happen, say western diplomats in Prishtina (2)
· Rugova and Daci have decided to participate in Vienna meeting
(3)
· Holkeri confirms that Kosovo will be represented by Rugova and
Daci (3)
· Thaçi: Rexhepi's stance is completely personal (3)
· Albania held local elections yesterday (4)
· Kostov: Cakallla and Breza will be brought before justice [Macedonia]
(4)
· BDI demands to precise army competencies [Macedonia] (4)
· Only few people obey new business working hours (7)
· Why does nobody care about 47 persons in Nis? (7)
· Jezerci residents do not want to change the name of their village
(8)
· Road Gjilan-Zheger-Kumanove is priority for the municipality
(8)
· Peja will have boulevard on both side of the river (9)
· AAK has aid that will be not servicing everybody (9)
Bota Sot
Front page
· Rexhepi: I will not go to Vienna on October 14
· Quint countries express deep regret with Rexhepi's stance
· If you want profit, invest in Kosovo, say officials of US mission
in Kosovo
· 40 exhumes bodies will be handed in
· Capitalism in Kosovo should have Kosovo's state seal
· Speech of US congressman Tom Lantos
· Who will win the elections in Albania?
Other headlines
· Kosovo assembly should equip the delegation of Kosovo with proper
tools (2)
· Beqiri: Capital is changing its view (3)
· Buçpapaj: Illusions of Covic who wants to make alliance
with Americans (3)
· Enough coal, but not electricity? (4)
· Ferizi: How was Qosja terrified? (4)
· Kosovo imports about 40 % of food products (5)
· Bytyçi: Good-will advices of American friends (6)
· 763 missing persons (6)
· Municipality has not access in overseeing Serbian education process
(7)
· Kelmendi: Weak characters of political elements in Kosovo (7)
· Real test for institutions [Albania] (8)
· Medics are against political solutions (9)
· Changes of law on statehood are favorable for Albanians [Macedonia]
(10)
Kosova Sot
Front page
· Prime Minister says 'no' to Vienna
· Is coalition in crisis?
· List of topics for discussion starts with transport and energy
· Moore: A big chess game in Balkans
· Political leaders on institutions
· Rugova and Daci inform Holkeri about their going to Vienna
· Narcotics come to Kosovo mainly from Macedonia
· Who is keeping some processes hostage in Kosovo
· Irons for smugglers and Custom officials
Other headlines
· Albania: Elections did not pass without incidents (2)
· Zivkovic: Dialogue a victory for the Serbian side (2)
· US: Talks to start regardless of the composition of Kosovo delegation
(2)
· UNIKOMB against Prishtina Belgrade dialogue (4)
· Hand over of dead bodies at Merdare (4)
· Policy of 'higher' calculations detrimental to Kosovo (5)
· Serwer and Hunter: Kosovo status could be discussed around 2005/
2006 (5)
· Demaçi: The political day is dawning (5)
Epoka e Re
Front page
· Government one step closer to dissolution
· Rugova and Daci with this behavior abandoned the Government!
· AAK happy with Rexhepi's refusal
· Kosovo treated as an aggressor, Serbia as a victim
· You do not cry for the brave, you sing for them, says Avni's
father
Other headlines
· Solana appreciates sending of Serbian troops to Afghanistan (3)
· Holbrooke: Serbians facing a historical crossroad (3)
· Citizens: Serbia should have apologized first (4)
· UNMIK proposes theses for talks with Belgrade (5)
· EU: The important thing is to start the dialogue (5)
· Zivkovic: Talks in Vienna a victory for the Serbian side (5)
· "Scotsman" Old rivalries threaten talks for Kosovo
(5)
· Elections in Albanian peaceful (6)
· If we could bring New York to Pristina (6)
Belgrade Media Highlights
· State Department on Kosovo (Politika/Tanjug)
· Holbrook and Couchner on Kosovo (Blic)
· Kosovo delegation known (Balkan)
· NATO to remain in Kosovo (Vecernje Novosti/Tanjug)
· Goran Bogdanovic on privatization (Glas)
· Upon Vienna talks (Vecernje Novosti)
· Zivkovic: Talks in Vienna are victory of Serb side (Balkan)
· Solana: Both sides should avoid tensions prior to talks (Blic)
· Covic's report on return of refugees (Vecernje Novosti/Tanjug)
· Dragoljub Micunovic on dialogue with Pristina (Glas/Srna)
· Belgrade-Pristina talks commence on Tuesday (Danas/Beta/Fonet)
· Ranko Krivokapic: 2005 - decisive year (Glas/Srna)
· Rexhepi not to go to Vienna (Politika/Beta)
· White Book on Albanian terrorism by Serbian government (Politika)
· German radio on Kosovo IDPs (Politika/Tanjug)
State Department on Kosovo (Politika/Tanjug)
A high official of the State Department has stated that the Belgrade-Pristina
talks will commence as scheduled, on 14 October, regardless of the fact
that the Kosovo Assembly had not given accord for the dialogue in Vienna.
"Talks will begin as scheduled, on 14 October," he said. "It
is in Kosovo's interest to take part in the upcoming dialogue. We call
on Belgrade and Pristina to show full and constructive participation in
the upcoming dialogue," a high official of the State Department told
Radio Free Europe.
Holbrook and Couchner on Kosovo (Blic)
Serbia cannot have Kosovo and enter the EU at the same time, stated former
US ambassador at the UN Richard Holbrook and former UNMIK head Bernard
Couchner. Serbs must start facing the reality. Not many of them dare to
publicly say that, but they know that Kosovo is lost. They are actually
waiting for the world - the UN and the US - to end the job that commenced
with the war in 1999, it is stated in their joint editorial published
by the Wall Street Journal.
Kosovo delegation known (Balkan)
Kosovo President Ibrahim Rugova, Premier Bajram Rexhepi and Assembly Speaker
Nexhad Daci will represent the Kosovo Albanian community. The co-minister
for returns in the Kosovo government Milorad Todorovic will represent
the Serb community, and the health minister Resmije Mandiu will represent
the Turkish community in the delegation. Albanian sources state that PDK
AMs had given a green light at a session behind closed doors to Premier
Rexhepi to go to Vienna, by which Hashim Thaci's party has practically
supported the Belgrade-Pristina dialogue.
NATO to remain in Kosovo (Vecernje Novosti/Tanjug)
NATO Supreme Commander, US General James Jones, has stated that SFOR could
withdraw from B-H in the following 12-18 months, because it is estimated
that B-H could be sufficiently stable by then. The reduction of the number
of US soldiers in the Balkans, AP states, is the priority of US Defense
Minister Donald Ramsfeld, who wishes this way to alleviate the pressure
on its forces that are engaged in Afghanistan and Iraq. General Jones
has assessed that the issue of Kosovo and Metohija is a more difficult
problem and that NATO forces will have to stay there longer. According
to Jones, a larger part of NATO forces will withdraw from Macedonia by
the end of the year, where the EU took over the peace mission in March.
Goran Bogdanovic on privatization (Glas)
Goran Bogdanovic, Agriculture Minister in the Kosovo government, states
that the Kosovo Trust Agency has sold 22 companies, and not only two,
in the course of two tenders, as the CCK's economic department announced
this week. According to him, Albanians who bought these companies had
already paid for them, so it is difficult to expect that their selling
will be annulled. As reasons for the decision by the EU and UNMIK to temporarily
abolish the privatization of socially owned and public companies in Kosovo
and Metohija, Bogdanovic states the stipulations from UNSCR 1244, according
to which UNMIK has only the right to administer, but not to dispose with
the property in this region of Serbia. "Apart from that, the privatization
concept implemented by UNMIK has not respected the economic PRINCIPLES
that property that is being sold also has a PASSIVE. Trustees, usually
companies and entrepreneurs from Serbia, have been omitted, so only a
separated part of the company, without loans, is being sold according
to this model, says Bogdanovic, who adds that the UN decision as to what
should be further done is now awaited.
Upon Vienna talks (Vecernje Novosti)
The fact that UNMIK Head Harri Holkeri has also been the target of the
most extreme of the Albanians speaks about the atmosphere among them upon
the negotiations scheduled for 14 October. As Novosti learns, his cabinet
in Pristina received an anonymous message on 9 October: that he will regret
for coming at all to Kosovo if he is not "cooperative towards Albanians."
The same day, at 3:30 p.m., his armored car was stoned, while a car from
his escort was attacked in Pristina, when one Italian was wounded.
Zivkovic: Talks in Vienna are victory of Serb side (Balkan)
Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Zivkovic has assessed that the upcoming Belgrade-Pristina
dialogue represents a "victory of the Serb side" and expects
these talks to be an opportunity for the Albanian side to take on part
of its responsibility for the situation in Kosovo. "I expect the
meeting, which is a victory of the Serb side since we had been offering
talks for three years now, to also be an opportunity for a chance to the
Albanian delegation to take on its part of both political and practical
responsibility," Zivkovic told journalists in Nis. The premier stated
that the Serbian delegation for talks in Vienna on 14 October was completed,
but that he didn't wish to announce the names.
Solana: Both sides should avoid tensions prior to talks (Blic)
The High Representative of the EU has warned that, prior to the beginning
of the Pristina-Belgrade dialogue, "both sides should cautiously
work so as to avoid tensions." "I am convinced that both sides
will respect their own obligations, turn the page and begin with the creation
of new ties. Any holding would mean postponement of finding solutions
for the concrete problem of common people, and I think that politicians
should be aware of the consequences of their deeds," Solana told
Dan. "Kosovo will either way be part of Europe. In order for this
to happen, the situation must improve and I am convinced that this will
happen," he added.
Covic's report on return of refugees (Vecernje Novosti/Tanjug)
Over the past two years, only 484 refugees returned into the Kosovo and
Metohija villages of Grabac, Bica, Osojane, Belo Polje, Musnikovo, Novaci
and Sredska and that is due to the increased fear that Serbs experience
because of UNMIK and KFOR lack of readiness to protect them efficiently,
notes a report written by the Head of the CCK Nebojsa Covic. Returnees
had been given aid for the construction of houses and the infrastructure,
then help in cattle, agricultural technology, fresh food, equipping schools,
ambulances, health means and the university, as well as for other living
needs, it is stressed in Covic's report on the work of the CCK over the
past two years that has been published in the latest issue of the journal
International Affairs.
Dragoljub Micunovic on dialogue with Pristina (Glas/Srna)
SaM Parliament Speaker Dragoljub Micunovic has assessed that the talks
in Vienna on Kosovo and Metohija will be "long and difficult"
because there exist "many factors and lobbies that are included in
this." "We must be united, and there must not be party competition.
We must have complete trust in our state representatives that they will
represent the interests of our state and all the people in Kosovo, and
to be ready for very long talks, without the right to a mistake,"
Micunovic said in an interview for Podgorica Pobjeda.
Belgrade-Pristina talks commence on Tuesday (Danas/Beta/Fonet)
Beta's collocutor has stated that the gathering in Vienna is envisaged
to commence before noon, while UNMIK Head Harri Holkeri will be the presiding.
Following the welcome address, four working groups will be formed for
the resolution of the problems of the return of IDPs, shedding light of
the missing, energy and transport. The presiding of each of the working
groups will be an UNMIK official. None of the solutions to the issues
dealt by the members of the working groups will be possible to bring without
the accord of both sides. If some of the sides don't agree, then the problem
will be transferred to the members of the plenary body in the dialogue.
No solution will be valid without the approval of UNMIK Head Harri Holkeri,
while the information on the course of the dialogue or the reached solution
will also not be available for the public without his permission.
Ranko Krivokapic: 2005 - decisive year (Glas/Srna)
Belgrade-Pristina talks are a start, but 2005 will be the decisive year
for Kosovo, the speaker of the Montenegrin parliament said. Ranko Krivokapic
told Podgorica's Pobjeda that next week's meeting between the authorities
in Belgrade and Pristina represent the start of a "long path"
to resolving the practical problems facing Kosovo's people. But 2005,
after elections in the US and Serbia, will decide the future of the province,
he added.
Rexhepi not to go to Vienna (Politika/Beta)
Kosovo Prime Minister Bajram Rexhepi will not attend talks between Pristina
and Belgrade due to begin on Tuesday, Pristina daily Koha Ditore reports.
"I won't be going to Vienna, definitely not", Rexhepi is quoted
as saying at a ceremony to mark the fourth anniversary of the founding
of PDK, the second largest party in the province. Koha Ditore writes that
there was an uneasy atmosphere at the session of the PDK.
White Book on Albanian terrorism by Serbian government (Politika)
Albanian terrorism in Kosovo and Metohija, as well as in the municipalities
of Presevo, Bujanovac and Medvedja, is linked to various forms of organized
crime, and represents constant danger for the safety of citizens, but
also endangers stability not only in our country, but also in the neighboring.
The goals of those carrying out terrorist activities and violence are
legalization of criminal activities and fortune, acquired this way by
individuals and groups. The achievement of the stated goals should also
lead to the creation of a Great Albania or Great Kosovo. These facts have
been stated in the just published White Book by the Serbian government,
entitled "Albanian terrorism and organized crime in Kosovo and Metohija."
German radio on Kosovo IDPs (Politika/Tanjug)
The return of IDPs to Kosovo and the security of Serbs are the key issues
discussed in the meetings of the Serbs with representatives of the international
community in the country and abroad, reports German radio Deutche Welle,
concluding that the return of IDPs is not going according to plan but
is rather symbolic, centering on a few village communities, while no one
is returning to the cities. Of the 218,000 Serb IDPs from Kosovo not even
one percent has returned, even though the figures of the UNHCR say that
more than 4,130 Serbs have returned. The German radio quoted the CCK as
reporting that only about a thousand Serbs have returned.
|