At a swearing-in ceremony of Judges and
Prosecutors back in December 2003, President of the Supreme Court of
Kosovo Rexhep Haxhimusa said “In every state the judiciary constitutes
the axis of the rule of law, at the epicentre of which stand human freedoms
and rights, whose protection is mainly in the domain of the judiciary,
without which one could not imagine a civilized, advanced and democratic
society.”
In this context, Mr. Haxhimusa stressed the need “to establish
an independent judiciary, which is separate from the other two powers,
and vested with its relevant competences, immune from influence of any
kind, which in effect, represents a fundamental prerequisite for a genuine
exercise of this power.”
Institutions that control judicial administration and management can
exercise external influence over courts in general, as well as over
individual judges. The way courts are managed impacts on the judicial
independence, so the influence of administrative structures on the judiciary
requires careful consideration. This constitutes one of the key underlying
principles in the transfer of responsibilities to the new Kosovo Ministry
of Justice to be established this year.
International standards vary as to the form of judicial administration
best able to preserve judicial independence. The European Association
of Judges calls for the judiciary to be administered by an independent
body comprised of judges. The Council of Europe, reflecting the existing
differences among European states, allows for a variety of models. At
a minimum, all the standards suggest that the bodies responsible for
administering the courts should be prevented from using their authority
to influence judges’ decision-making and that the judiciary should
have some form of significant input into its own administration. Otherwise
judicial independence could be undermined.
The key lies in establishing transparent and unambiguous rules and procedures
to prevent the administrative body- wherever it sits-from interfering
with the core decision-making independence of judges. The draft ‘Law
on Courts’, proposed by the Department of Justice, provides for
a truly independent, impartial, responsible and accountable judiciary
in Kosovo, consistent with European standards.
The Kosovo Judicial Council (KJC), which will replace the Kosovo Judicial
and Prosecutorial Council (KJPC) and will be also responsible for the
administration of the courts, shall act independently and be responsible
to regulate the affairs of the judiciary. In particular, the draft law
provides the KJC with clear and transparent criteria for judicial appointments
and sets out disciplinary liability for judges. The establishment of
the KJC was designed to remove improper political or other influence
within the judicial system while making sure that judges uphold the
rule of law for all citizens.
The KJC will serve as an administrative arm of the judicial branch with
defined powers. Its role is no longer that of an advisory body, as its
predecessor KJPC has been. The Law on Courts must operate within the
Constitutional Framework and comply with the current and future laws
of Kosovo. Indeed, the KJC will have authority over many functions associated
with the management and administration of the judiciary. The KJC will
play a primary role in recommending the judicial budget, administering
the budget, and providing policy guidance for the court administration.
Currently, court administration is a transferred power under the competence
of the Ministry of Public Services. The ‘Law on Courts’
envisages placing court administration under KJC control in order to
limit potential undue influence of the executive branch on the judicial
branch.
Responsibilities over the organization and proper functioning of the
courts; training, including professional and vocational training, of
judges and judicial personnel; appointment, disciplining and dismissing
of members of judicial support staff will pass under the KJC control.
Further, according to the new Law, the KJC will have a direct overview
on issues related to, among others, finance (including resources allocation)
and personnel matters.
Achieving an independent judiciary entails ensuring not only that judges
analyse evidence and interpret the law free of external coercion and
influence, but also that the judicial functions are institutionally
separate from the executive and legislative powers. In other words,
within appropriate limits, the Kosovo judiciary will gain the power
to self-manage and self-administer.
Arianna Lepore
Legal Policy Division, Deptt of Justice