UNMIK ON AIR
22 July 2003
War Crimes Lejislation
(Andrea Saula)
Hello and welcome to UNMIK on AIR with Hysni Recica
and Martin Redi.
While major war crimes trials are conducted by the
International Criminal Tribunal for ex Yugoslavia (ICTY), the UN tribunal
expects the local judiciary in all countries bound by ICTY rules to prosecute
lower profile suspects. Until now, these institutions across former Yugoslavia
have made little headway. Kosovo is in
a league apart, given that its judicial system is in part under UNMIK
supervision.
The draft law, adopted recently by
the Serbian parliament envisages setting up a special war crimes prosecution
office to cover the whole of Serbia.
Belgrade based
human rights activist Natasa Kandic has been monitoring war crimes committed in Bosnia and in
Kosovo. She welcomes the new Serbian legislation because she says Serbia still
has a long way to go before becoming a normal democratic society.
Natasa Kandic: The
special war crimes prosecution office will be totally independent. The
prosecutor will have autonomy and independence in his decision-making. However,
demands from experts for a special investigation unit have been rejected.
Special units from the Serbian interior ministry will conduct the inquiry into
both organized crime and war crimes.
Behxhet Shala,
executive director of the Council for the Protection of Human Rights and
Freedoms in Prishtina feels that things are slowly changing for the better in
Serbia, he remains unconvinced by this new draft law.
Behxhet Shala: The fact that some people who
were involved or who directly took part in committing crimes against civilians
in Kosovo have been arrested is a step forward, but this has more to do with
propaganda than delivering justice. Sentences so far in Serbia are symbolic,
very low sentences.
Serbia has long been accused of not cooperating
sufficiently with the ICTY - one of the most wanted fugitives, Ratko Mladic,
the former Bosnian Serb military leader is still believed to be hiding in
Serbia. Other war crimes suspects are also alleged to be at large and even
sometimes, part of government structures. A context that makes the new war
crimes legislation all the more urgent.
But human rights activists like Natasha Kandic remain skeptical that
higher-ranking army or police officials will in fact face prosecution.
Natasha Kandic: There
are trials, but not against those who ordered those actions or who were in
command. And at this moment, it is hard to imagine that the special war
crimes prosecution office will have the competency and power to accuse those
who occupy high-level functions. Do not forget that there are still many senior
officials suspected of involvement in violations of international humanitarian
law.
Many of them are not
accused of specific acts but their names figure in other indictments being
examined by the ICTY.
Goran Radosavljevic Guri,
the commander of the gendarmerie and Sreten Lukic the head of Public Security
fit into this category, says Kandic, who adds that this probably also applies
to the newly appointed head of Military Intelligence.
Natasha Kandic: In the case of the head of Military intelligence
Momir Stojanovic we tried to warn the Serbian Government and the Government of
S&M that there is very serious testimony in the ICTY that accuses Momir
Stojanovic for ordering the murder of civilians in the village of Meja on April
27th 1999.
One
more reason for mistrust. Behxhet Shala,again.
Behxhet Shala: We have not yet seen top level
officials being brought to justice in Serbia, on the contrary there are moves
to sacrifice pawns, small criminals, in order to protect big figures, who are
in the hierarchy of internal affairs, the military, or even in the political
scene. It is an effort to cover up. They act as if nothing had happened in Kosovo.
They do not feel they should apologize or at least to contribute to making
these people responsible for what they did.
All is not bleak however - things are moving forward in
Serbia, says Natasha Kandic, citing the Sjeverin case, when 17 Sandzak Muslims
were kidnapped and killed and the 1999 Podujevo massacre. Police, for the first
time, provided evidence in the Sjeverin case.
Similarly, during the retrial of the Podujevo case, the public was given
the opportunity to head first hand evidence about the events of March 28th 1999 in Podujevo.
Behxhet Shala: That
was the first chance for truth, about what happened on that March 28th,
to be heard in front of the Court. That truth from survivors, children and
their parents is terrifying. Everybody in the Courtroom was touched deeply
because it is hard to imagine that something like that happened. So cruel, so
brutal.
So cruel, so brutal. Those words could be repeated for so
many crimes. The mass grave of Kosovo Albanians in Batajnica for example, or
the Ovcara case, when 200 Croat civilians were killed in Vukovar hospital. Authorities say these horrific incidents
will be amongst the first to be taken up by the newly formed special
prosecution office. It remains to be seen whether they keep their word.
That
brings us to an end of this edition of UNMIK on AIR. Thank you for listening.