UNMIK ON AIR

AUGUST 12 2003

Ombudsman’s report on HR situation in Kosovo

 

 

Hello and welcome to UNMIK ON AIR with Martin Redi.

 

The Ombudsperson Institution in Kosovo’s latest report on the human rights situation takes UNMIK to task on several issues.

Amongst others - that Kosovars do not have the access to European and international legal institutions that other citizens of Europe have, that UNMIK has not sufficiently devolved powers to local institutions, that Kosovo’s judicial system is weak and understaffed, that because Kosovo’s executive and legislative are essentially part of UNMIK, the principle that the executive branch of government should not be above the rule of law is compromised. 

 

All these factors, concludes Ombudsman Marek Novitski, mean that Kosovar citizens are being short-changed in terms of respect of human rights, and that UNMIK itself is reflecting its indifference to the rule of law by which the rest of Europe is bound.

 

Strong charges to make against an institution now in its fourth year of existence, but Novitski is adamant - Kosovo, he says is a human rights black hole.

 

Marek Novitski: Black hole in the sense Kosovo is not part of any international system of protection of human rights, people from Kosovo cannot use any international mechanism of hr protection, people from Kosovo cannot lodge complaints with the European Court of Human Rights for example Kosovo is not covered by any reporting mechanism based on different human rights mechanism; in this sense it is a black hole.

 

This is not just an abstract concern, he says when asked whether such charges are not in fact abstract. There are some 2000 cases from his home country, Poland, currently pending at the European Court and that many cases raised with the Ombudsman here in Kosovo would end up in a human rights court anywhere else in Europe.

The Ombudsperson report makes sweeping generalizations and doesn’t take into consideration the progress made in various sectors, rejoins Alexander Borg Olivier, head of UNMIK’s legal affairs department.

 

Alexander Borg Olivier: While it is true that Kosovo because of its political status the habitual residents do not have access to int. for a but at the same time, it has to be recognized that Kosovo is being governed by an interim administration that attaches huge importance to respect for human rights one of the key principles is to ensure that all legislation meets human rights standards so every action taken in Kosovo is taken very much with this in mind so I’m quite satisfied that with all the international presence and all the int. attention we have in Kosovo, respect for human rights is certainly not in the background at all. 

 

Every piece of legislation, says Borg Olivier, is scrutinized by the newly constituted inter pillar working group on human rights. Several other organizations also monitor the human rights situation in Kosovo, and Borg Olivier clearly does not share Novitski’s worry that Kosovars are being deprived of basic rights.

Extra judicial detentions are another area of concern for the Ombudsman, who nonetheless adds that there are no such cases at the present moment and that the situation has improved considerably. Such detentions are few and far between, stresses UNMIK”s Borg-Olivier.

 

Alexander Borg Olivier: there were instances in the past where extra judicial detentions were necessary because of particular circumstances, at times when the judicial structure and legislation in place was not sufficient to permit another course of action, but I believe that there has not been any exercise of extra judicial detention by UNMIK since December of 2001; as to detentions by KFOR, these would be for KFOR to answer for KFOR has its own separate mandate of course if there is evidence that such individuals have committed any criminal act, then those individuals should be passed on to UNMIK.

 

According to Novitski, at one point there were up to 70 people detained in the US controlled Camp Bondsteel, but he admits that this is a thing of the past. But he is concerned about the lack of clarity in the way laws are published in Kosovo and hence the abuses that can occur. It’s not just a question of how many copies are published or whether they are available on the Internet, says Novitski. Under European standards, a law that is not properly published, the law is not a law.

 

Marek Novitski: This is a question of access very important is to follow proper procedure concerning official publications, it has many legal consequences, and if in this respect you do not follow the proper procedure there is a risk of arbitrary application of laws,  different abuses

 

Not so, replies Alexander Borg Olivier. All laws published through his office get passed only after extensive consultation and this, he says, has actually increased since the constitutional framework was promulgated.

Another complaint from the Ombudsman, one that figured in previous reports as well is what he calls lack of communication with UNMIK. Cooperation is not always optimal, he says, in terms of access to information and responses to concerns raised.

 

Marek Novitski: We need, and this is also the legal obligation of all institutions to cooperate by providing information, by creating conditions for free inspection of files, access to documents, many time we are waiting a very long time for answers when we speak about cases concerning the police, there is a problem with access to files.

 

The question of the impunity and lack of accountability of international personnel is another issue of concern for Marek Novitski. But insists Alexander Borg Olivier, all UN personnel are subject to the rules of conduct that are imposed on them and are fully accountable. In certain cases immunity can also be lifted

 

Alexander Borg Olivier: While it is true that there are certain functional immunities and privileges that apply to work of internationals in Kosovo, this does not in anyway shield the persons concerned from any wrongdoing with which they may be associated. So yes, there are immunities and these immunities are necessary for the proper functioning of the mission, this immunity is not intended nor does it ever shield any criminality or wrongdoing. As far as police are concerned, again they are subject to various rules and code of conduct when necessary immunities are lifted, when necessary, people are removed and repatriated from this mission.

 

The Ombudsman does however note progress in the freedom of movement and security for non-Albanians in Kosovo. Much more needs to be done to bring them on par with the others, but then much of this depends on the people and institutions of Kosovo, and not the international authorities. As for UNMIK, it has heard Marek Novitski’s concerns. Perhaps his next report will reflect the changing reality.